
CFTC staff opens a path for tokenized customer investments and onchain records
Four new FAQ answers spell out when derivatives firms may use tokenized permitted investments and blockchain records, while keeping existing custody and production duties in place.
By BLAKE Chuck / Published September 25, 2026
The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission's staff gave derivatives firms a more precise answer on tokenization Thursday. In a September 24 update to its crypto and blockchain FAQs, three CFTC divisions addressed two practical questions: whether customer funds can be invested in tokenized versions of permitted assets, and whether regulatory records can live on a blockchain.
The answer on customer funds is conditional. Question 12 of the updated FAQs says a futures commission merchant or derivatives clearing organization may invest those funds in a tokenized form of an investment already permitted under Regulation 1.25. The underlying asset must itself qualify. The token must convey the same or functionally equivalent legal and economic rights, meet the rule's limits on liquidity, concentration and maturity, and be held with an acceptable depository. For an eligible government money market fund in tokenized form, staff also expects a custody acknowledgment letter. Putting an asset on a chain does not make an otherwise impermissible investment eligible.
The remaining three new answers deal with records. Staff says blockchain systems may satisfy existing requirements under Regulations 1.31 and 45.2 if firms can fully meet the rules' demands, including authenticity, reliability and the ability to produce records for inspection. That covers a range of registered entities, including swap execution facilities, contract markets and clearing organizations. The full FAQ frames the regulations as technology neutral.
Free to play
Make your call with Beat Chuck
Check the challenge board for the latest open games.
All Beat Chuck games →
Question 15 makes a narrower point that matters for system design: staff would not object solely because a firm elects not to keep a separate offchain copy. But a firm using a public, permissionless chain still needs controls to retain and produce records during an emergency or network or block-explorer outage. An accessible transaction history on a normal day is not by itself an emergency retrieval plan.
The update expands on FAQs first published in March, alongside earlier CFTC staff guidance on tokenized collateral and digital assets used as margin. CoinDesk separately reported the September 24 additions. These are staff views applying existing rules, not a new exemption or a blanket approval of any asset or recordkeeping system. For firms building onchain operations, the live question is whether the token's rights, custody arrangement and record-production controls actually satisfy those existing duties.
More from BLAKE
Related stories
PolicySEC creates a five-year path for limited onchain trading of tokenized U.S. stocks
PolicySEC transfer-agent proposal brings tokenized settlement into the recordkeeping debate
MarketsCFTC staff said some crypto perpetuals can trade as foreign futures
MarketsSEC staff: a token that tracks a stock may not be the stock